Drafting & Summarization for Healthcare

Drafting and Summarization workflows ask the system to produce first drafts: compliance memos, regulatory filings, briefing notes, clinical summaries, contract abstracts. The work is faster when the model writes the first version, but the accuracy of the draft determines whether the reviewer's edit is targeted (correcting a few claims) or exhaustive (rewriting from scratch).

Citorum produces drafts with every claim traceable to the source span the model drew from. Adjudication scores each section before the draft returns, so the reviewer sees which sections are Verified, which are Review Recommended (worth a sanity check), and which are Do Not Rely (worth rewriting from source). Reviewers report that the targeted-edit pattern is two to four times faster than reviewing an unverified draft, because the labels tell them where to focus attention.

Healthcare deployments operate under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), state health-data laws, and — for federal customers — the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) trajectory. Citorum runs inside the customer's environment so Protected Health Information (PHI) never transits a third-party model Application Programming Interface. The deployment supports the controls expected of a Business Associate: per-tenant isolation, encryption at rest with keys held in the customer's Key Management Service, audit lineage for every retrieval and response, and access controls that gate documents by patient relationship, care team, and role.

Common workflows include clinical reference research over institutional knowledge bases and society guidelines, claims-coding research over payer policies, internal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliance Q&A across organizational policies, and clinical summary drafting from chart documents — each with citations and faithfulness labels so a reviewing clinician sees the system's confidence at the moment the answer is given.