Compliance Q&A for Legal

Compliance Q&A workflows ask questions about the organization's own policies, controls, procedures, and obligations — what does our retention policy say about this?, do we have a control that addresses this audit finding?, what is our position on this regulator's new bulletin?. The accuracy bar is high because the answer often becomes part of an audit response or a regulator's record.

Citorum's adjudication pipeline scores every answer against the cited sources before it returns. Verified — Cite Source answers are safe to act on; Review Recommended answers route to a reviewer queue most regulated organizations already maintain; Do Not Rely — Consult Expert answers are presented with the label visible so the user does not accidentally treat them as authoritative. The combination of citation-grounded answers and explicit faithfulness labels is what makes this category usable in regulated organizations rather than just demo-able.

Legal teams operate under a regime that demands provenance for every claim. Citorum runs inside the firm or in-house environment and indexes the matter files, contracts, depositions, regulatory bulletins, and case-law sources the team already maintains. Retrieval is hybrid — vector and full-text search combined with metadata filtering on matter, jurisdiction, privilege class, and access-control attributes — so a paralegal sees only the documents they're cleared to see.

Every answer carries citations to the specific document spans the model drew from, plus a faithfulness label. Verified — Cite Source for answers grounded in the corpus, Review Recommended for ambiguous responses that an attorney should sanity-check, and Do Not Rely — Consult Expert when the corpus didn't actually support the answer or sources contradicted it. The audit log captures the full lineage so an opposing counsel's discovery request, an internal compliance review, or a malpractice inquiry can reconstruct exactly what was retrieved, what was sent to the model, what came back, and who asked.